MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> 1/ The statement that you were objecting to here does not use "we"
> at all, so defining "we" is irrelevant.
I replied to Josselin who wrote the following:
"If providing any sort of crap _we_ can was a service to our
users, there wouldn't be any DFSG.
_We_ believe providing a non-free manual is a disservice to
our users. If they can't modify it freely, and can't put it on
their encrypted filesystem, _we_ feel it is not suitable for
them."
If you are not capable to read carefully mails you are talking about
before pretending "this is irrelevant", I do not believe the rest of
you mail can be of any interest. Sorry.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
