David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:50:09 -0400 (EDT) > Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be fair to say that Debian has decided that the GFDL is not > > free according to the DFSG. This opinion has only been getting > > stronger and more unified over time. However, there is a significant > > minority who believe that documentation should be judged by a > > different standard than the DFSG. They have yet to enumerate what > > those differences would be, though. > > Please don't be so quick about saying that. Lots of people said things > like "there is a significant minority ..." or even "the majority of ..." > when it came to saying the GFDL was fully Free. That was obviously > debunked (and quite soundly as well, I might add). Let's not make that > mistake again eh? :)
I bear the seemingly unusual distinction of actually having read all of the posts about this topic to debian-legal. I stand behind that characterization. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
