On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:50:09 -0400 (EDT) Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be fair to say that Debian has decided that the GFDL is not > free according to the DFSG. This opinion has only been getting > stronger and more unified over time. However, there is a significant > minority who believe that documentation should be judged by a > different standard than the DFSG. They have yet to enumerate what > those differences would be, though.
Please don't be so quick about saying that. Lots of people said things like "there is a significant minority ..." or even "the majority of ..." when it came to saying the GFDL was fully Free. That was obviously debunked (and quite soundly as well, I might add). Let's not make that mistake again eh? :)
pgpeRUNIAN5lg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
