On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:27PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > To the extent that licenses should be considered software here, yes. I > do, however, disagree with your characterization of this as a double ... > But there is a bright line between requiring modifiability of a > package contents, and requiring modifiability of a package's legal > metadata. In contrast, documentation and programs are both package > contents; no one has yet identified the bright line to use for > demarcation of these two categories.
For the benefit of those who might otherwise assume that Steve is voicing a lone opinion here: Right on! <AOL>! Amen Brother! ... -- Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] This will be a memorable month -- no matter how hard you try to forget it.
