On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 03:07:37AM +0900, Fedor Zuev wrote: > Maybe. But there also another element in the picture. For > GFDL. This is a not a random package from the random source with the > random licence. This is a licence from Stallman, the inventor of the > term "free software" and creator of the free software movement. > There is no reason to think that Stallman is an idiot and can not > see these semi-trivial arguments, presented here against GFDL. > Contrary, in the past Stallman so many times was right, in very > pragmatical sense of "right", whereas virtually everyone else was > wrong, so he shall be far more credible than random subscriber of > debian-legal. So, it may as well be seen as the test case for the > DFSG as for the GFDL.
When I looked up "Appeal to Authority" in my _Basic Logical Fallacies_ textbook, I saw the above. -- G. Branden Robinson | Don't use nuclear weapons to Debian GNU/Linux | troubleshoot faults. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111 http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpNCJJTJEitr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
