On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 02:54:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:38PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:34:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > This license is not actually DFSG-free; it grants the right to make > > > > copies, to use copies for creating products, and to distribute copies > > > > *internally*, but it does not grant the right to distribute copies > > > > publically or to modify the file. > > > The perceived consensus in 2002 was that the license is DFSG-free, but > > > this is not my point. (However, sometimes I think it's easier to > > > intepret the license itself than the result of the discussion about it > > > on this list.) > > Hmm, I've reviewed the archives and it looks like you're right here. > Someone got some specific references? Was I part of this consensus > (just curious)? <http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200211/msg00288.html> ff.. Much of the meat of the thread seems to have been relegated to debian-devel: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200211/msg02884.html>. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
