On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 05:10:38PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 10:34:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > This license is not actually DFSG-free; it grants the right to make > > > copies, to use copies for creating products, and to distribute copies > > > *internally*, but it does not grant the right to distribute copies > > > publically or to modify the file. > > > The perceived consensus in 2002 was that the license is DFSG-free, but > > this is not my point. (However, sometimes I think it's easier to > > intepret the license itself than the result of the discussion about it > > on this list.) > > Hmm, I've reviewed the archives and it looks like you're right here.
Someone got some specific references? Was I part of this consensus (just curious)? -- G. Branden Robinson | The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson
pgpDFChDZgya1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
