On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 04:09:02PM -0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] The FSF is willing to characterize a document with > > invariant sections as "free" because this allows the FSF to use such > > sections to promote software freedom. > > I'm not sure that is accurate. I *think* the FSF position is that free > documentation can be contained within a non-free document. Note that > FDL stands for Free Documentation Licence, not Free Document Licence.
Free Documentation that can only be instantiated in a non-Free Document is not Free. -- G. Branden Robinson | You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory [EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would pass it just fine. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson
pgpdcTVSuBKog.pgp
Description: PGP signature
