> ... Since RMS > seems unwilling to change anything, I'd say that _all_ GFDL'd works > have to go into non-free.
RMS did not say that. He listened to Debian's concerns, and acknowledged that there were GDFL-related issues he had not previously been aware of. He characterized them as *primarily* consisting of "license compatibility" problems, which was indeed the case. To quote RMS's relevant message: > ... the rest are real inconveniences ... Debian should give RMS a chance to think for a while, and consult with others including his legal council and other parties at the FSF, rather than taking hasty action. This is a courtesy we've extended to upstream authors many times before, and it seems unreasonable not to extend it in this case as well.
