On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 12:18:37 +0200, Alexandre Dulaunoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes & No. For example, a Free Software author wants to warn user > for a specific usage of the software. The classical example is a > RFID software that can be used as a tool against privacy. He adds a > warning note in the documentation, the text is irremovable but other > people can comment on the warning but they can't remove the warning. Hmm. If the software is free, I can then change the software to remove the specific behaviour being warned against; but the documentation still contains a incorrect, and irremovable warning. I supppose I can tack on even more irremovable text to counter the warning (perhaps confusing the users). I would consider that not free for other electronic entities; I consider it similarily limiting when it comes to the documentation. manoj -- The way these things go, there are probably 6 or 8 kludgey ways to do it, and a better way that involves rethinking something that hasn't been rethunk yet. Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C