> (Meanwhile, messages regarding the perceived problems have generally
> been ignored outright. Even messages asking for clarification: "It
> looks to me like the FDL prohibits this.
>
> Depending on where and how you sent them, that might or might not
> indicate a problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the standard place for
> inquiries. If questions sent there did not get answered, please show
> me the unanswered message so I can investigate what went wrong. I
> will try to make sure it does not happen again.
What about the entire set of comments on the draft version of the
GFDL? [1] There was never a response to any of those comments.
When people ask for explanation of a license, we try to answer in
order to help them out. Criticism and demands are a different matter;
we deal with that in whatever way suits us.
Whether to change the GFDL is not a Debian decision, so I've decided
not to discuss that here.
