Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, other people purporting to act on behalf of the FSF do. > > Did they really claim to be speaking for the FSF, or were they just > expressing support for the FSF? Anyone can do the latter, but we did > not ask anyone to speak for the FSF about this issue on this list. > > (Meanwhile, messages regarding the perceived problems have generally > been ignored outright. Even messages asking for clarification: "It > looks to me like the FDL prohibits this. > > Depending on where and how you sent them, that might or might not > indicate a problem. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the standard place for > inquiries. If questions sent there did not get answered, please show > me the unanswered message so I can investigate what went wrong. I > will try to make sure it does not happen again.
What about the entire set of comments on the draft version of the GFDL? [1] There was never a response to any of those comments. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.2-comments.txt
