Dylan Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I agree with the stance that this documentation is not, in > fact, Free, I'd like to point out that the GFDL does not reflect any > change in RMS's stance: the Emacs manual has always been licensed > with invariant sections, for instance. Richard Stallman's idea of > Freedom might differ from yours, but it hasn't changed very much.
I realize that. But, at the very least, I wasn't aware of his position before this came out however many months ago. And what's more, I think it's fair to say that he's taking a more obvious stand on the issue than he did before. Not that I'm saying that this is a new agenda on his part or anything, but the licensing of documentation has become a bigger issue than it once was. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03
