Jaime E . Villate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:33:19AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:21:13PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > I would point out that the FSF has rewritten its views as well. For > > > example, I protested that the FSF's acceptance of invariant sections > > > contradicted its own reasing in the "why free manuals are important" > > > document; the result was that the FSF changed the document. > > > > Do you have the previous version of the document? > > > > I'd like to prepare a word diff of the old and new versions, and > > preserve it for posterity. > > You can easily do that using the viewcvs interface to www.gnu.org > > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/?cvsroot=www.gnu.org > > I've failed to find the document "why free manuals are important" that > Thomas Bushnell refers. Can he point out in viewcvs the two versions > where the alleged change of the document occurred and some prove of > the correlation with his protest?
Well, that document is free-doc.html, so: http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/philosophy/free-doc.html?cvsroot=www.gnu.org CVS begins Feb 13 2001. The first version is pretty much the same as the first. Did this happens before 2001?
