Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 14 May 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote: >> I don't agree. Just take out the offending part. > > The GFDL does not allow us to take out the offending part - it contains > sections which are not allowed to be removed.
I think this is want he meant. > If Emacs + it's documentation is considered to be a single entity which is > a derived work of both a GPL product and a GFDL product, it is > undistributable even in non-free. Not to mention the rest of GNU software providing documentation. > I personally consider them seperate works which we aggregate and > distribute together, but the FSF takes a pretty wide interpretation of > "linking", so I could be in the minority. > >> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > That's insane. > > We may disagree with RMS on this, but it's not helpful to call him insane ;) Not RMS. Removing Emacs from main. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
