Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 02:22:06PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > I agree with all your points. I think we should move forward moving > > those docs to non-free. It'll mean a few packages from non-free on my > > systems, but if that's what RMS wants it's not a huge deal for me as > > long as they are still available. > > Let's not forget that there are at least four cases where manuals can > stay in main if we're willing to dust off older versions of them (gawk, > gdb, make, and texinfo).
That decision would be up to the maintainer, wouldn't it? I'd suggest that the old version go in main, and that the new version go in non-free. The non-free more uptodate one could be setup to supersede the older free one once installed (if the content is at all different, otherwise don't bother with it). Peter
