Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En réponse à David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > No, you'd have to attest that you've rewritten an existing guide > > > just because the license wasn't free. I'm dealing with guides > > > (hundreds of pages), not 5 pages HOWTOs or such. > > > > *shrug*, documentation is documentation. If you want some > > documentation > > and want it to be non-Free, that's your prerogative. But that doesn't > > mean it's Free, and it doesn't mean that Debian will accept it as > > such. > > Again, moving a program to non-free will motivate people to > write a free equivalent. But I can bet such thing is unlikely > to often happen with documentation. David Harris and friends > will never ever write a hundreds pages documentation only > because the equivalent is not free.
Again, this is not a good enough reason to keep it in main, whether or not you think it's true. Please stop raising it. Peter
