On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:02:23AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > But what you actually seem to say is: We have these two documents that > > except for a few places are identical; please make a lot of changes to > > yours so that we can have them "converge". That doesn't make much > > sense to me, > > Would you rather have the current state of affairs, where one group of > free software developers says the RPSL is a free software license, and > another says it's not a free software license? I can't imagine > anybody would think that's a good thing.
And yet every proposal you put forth is "Debian must become more like OSI and the DFSG must become more like OSD." I for one am glad that RPSL-licensed software is not in Debian, and would resist measures that would lead to a weakening of our Free Software standards.
