Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:45:25AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Unfortunately, it turns out that the UWash lawyers were right about > > the way these clauses are understood by the courts; it sucks, but > > there it is. They didn't create the distinction, they just decided to > > use it. > > So the BSD license is non-free as written, and it's only the good graces > of the copyright holders that use it that keep us from getting sued? > > This is a problem!
Heh. We in fact now request of anything that the freedom to distribute modified versions is specified.
