On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 14:45, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Oh, I remember this. The sophists at UWash claim that: > > > > "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > > documentation for any purpose and without fee to the University of > > Washington is hereby granted," > > > > does not mean that you can modify and then distribute. > > Unfortunately, it turns out that the UWash lawyers were right about > the way these clauses are understood by the courts; it sucks, but > there it is. They didn't create the distinction, they just decided to > use it.
Which courts? Please cite a case. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "Once a man has tasted freedom he will never be content to be a slave." - Walt Disney
