On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 01:12:47PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Okay, so it says "aggregate", and selling _a_ book does not do in an
> aggregate form.  So I guess we need the right to modify and distribute
> for documentation to be free.

Following this idea, the requirement imposed by O'Reilly doesn't violate
the DFSG ...

Are we back to the beginning?

-- 
Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863
Home Page: http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
Undergraduate student of Computer Science @ University of Bologna, Italy
                 - Information wants to be Open -

Attachment: pgpDAJ3mUoRAq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to