On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Are you trying to make emacs20 non-free? >
There seems to have been a tendency throughout this discussion to determine _policy_ based on the _practice_ of the FSF. Doesn't anyone else think that this is the wrong way to proceed? With no disrespect to the FSF, I think that Debian should decide its policy by considering the merits of competing arguments. It shouldn't write policy in order to keep any particular package or packages out of non-free. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01
