On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:31:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I think I would be willing to sign on to Branden's latest proposal (as > referred to in the headers of this message), with two provisos.
That's not Branden's latest proposal. > First, I would like to replace the 32K limit with a 0.1% of total > documentation size limit, which I think allows exactly the same > current manuals as Branden's proposal. At the moment, I, personally, find any such limits far to generous. I could probably be persuaded to find a 100 byte limit acceptable, but giving permission for any package to include something of similar length to the GNU Manifesto is completely wrong, IMO. But you've repeatedly ignored such objections as "peripheral", so whatever. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
pgp0RTT3e4COc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
