Raul Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:16:19AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > Raul, why are you so quick to dismiss this? You state it like it > > was a matter of fact. Is this documented anywhere? > > I didn't dismiss it.
I guess I misread the end of your post. > [And, what is it that you want documentation on?] I meant like a blurb in Emacs etc/ directory or something, stating whether this was okay. You said: > Anyways: it's legal for elisp code to have a GPL-incompatible license. > However, it's not legal to distribute GPLed emacs with such code if that > code is intended to be used with emacs to implement some program. If any non-trivial code makes a call to an Emacs function, even say 'buffer-substring', then do we consider that loaded code a GPL'ed library? I guess that's the question. Peter
