>>Also, the court specifically said that "best effort"=="act in good >>faith". I don't see how you say that someone who uses the software >>but has no intention of ever contributing back changes (because their >>boss told them not to) is acting in good faith. The software should >>still not go in main. > >Fine, whatever, file the damn bugs against scheme <=7.4 then. Option C >was clause 2 of the scheme license. > >http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/projects/scheme/7.4/license.html
On debian, I could only find mit-scheme version 7.5. That release is under the GPL, so there is no need for a bug report. In any case, it would be useful to have a consensus on debian-legal about this issue. Do you agree that the license makes it non-free, or are you just tired of arguing? Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
