Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems like you're interpreting the weasel words to make the whole > clause have no practical effect. I don't think that we can really do > that. You're saying that if my boss tells me not to contribute back > changes, that is enough to foil "best effort". What if it is my wife? > What about the voices I hear in my head? I still think that the > package can't go in main.
I think (IIRC) that we've distributed older MIT Scheme releases, which have just those terms. It's fine to put arbitrary "please" requests into the license; if the request cannot be enforced, then it doesn't violate the DFSG.
