On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:41:54PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > So is mozilla in main or non-free?
You should be able to figure that out. Anyways, currently there's two licenses here: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ http://www.mozilla.org/NPL/NPL-1.0.html > If imap goes into non-free because of this one clause, it'd be logical > to reassess mozilla in light of it. Feel free to look into this yourself. Personally, I think you've confused mozilla and netscape. > BTW Raul, which clause of the DFSG is violated in this case? Beats me. I have a recollection of there being some interaction between some of the terms of the mozilla license and the required assignment of copyright to Netscape, that was a problem. I might be remembering wrong, or that might have been an earlier version of the license. I've not looked very closely at the current NPL, but I don't see any problem with it at the moment. -- Raul
