On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:44:55AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > >I urge the Debian community to reject this license; it looks to me like it > >might fail DFSG #9. > > "License Must Not Contaminate Other Software"? Really? I think it would > be a strange interpretation of a "Distribution" of UW-IMAP that extended > to other Debian packages.
[flame shield up] How does the GPL "Not Contaminate Other Software" when any software that so much as links to GPL'd code has restrictions placed on its license?
pgpATD39XGIGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
