> > Permitting the sale of GPLed derived products > > That is not what they are doing. The statement of intentions that were > quoted earlier in this thread said that they want to prevent people from > selling deriviative works, period. Nothing about closed-source.
Don't read everything as if it were a license.. =) If you try to interprete the CM interest you'll find that they just one to charge closed source derivatives, the GNU GPL would be just fine for them.
