On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 01:57:24AM -0500, Lynn Winebarger wrote: > I'm including the full text below. What I find particularly odious is > not the exclusion of minors (though it is odious), but the contention (as > usual in purported EULAs) that Corel still retains title to the copy of > the software downloaded, whether it's under GPL or not. The problem is, > that if they retain ownership, they (or someone else later down the road) > may attempt to circumvent the GPL by claiming the downloaders never owned > a copy, and therefore the license does not apply to them.
That doesn't matter unless the license says it matters. -- Raul
