"Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
There's a clause you seem to have overlooked, that I think makes it
non-free (sorry):
3. A reasonable fee may be charged to copy this software. Any fee
may be charged to support this software. This software may be
distributed as part of a larger (possibly commercial) software
distribution provided that no claim of ownership of this software
is made. However, no fee may be charged for the software itself.
Looks like a clause from the Artistic License, which has been judged
DFSG-free in the past:
5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this
Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this
Package. You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. However,
you may distribute this Package in aggregate with other (possibly
commercial) programs as part of a larger (possibly commercial) software
distribution provided that you do not advertise this Package as a
product of your own. You may embed this Package's interpreter within
an executable of yours (by linking); this shall be construed as a mere
form of aggregation, provided that the complete Standard Version of the
interpreter is so embedded.
