Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute without charge this > > software, documentation, images, etc. is granted, provided that this > > comment and the author's name is retained. The author assumes no > > responsibility for lost sleep as a consequence of use of this software. > *sigh*. This comes up about once a week now. The statement above, > and similar, are generally interpreted that there is no charge to > distribute it, not that you must not charge for it. Hmm, the usual phrase is "without fee". And it's not placed right after "distribute". I think this instance does refer to distribution. "Distribute without charge" is a normal phrase, as is "License without fee". Switch them around and it's not so normal anymore.
You have a point. I withdraw my argument. The upstream author should be asked for clarification.
