According to John Hasler:
> Chip Salzenberg writes:
> > We assumed that the export clause was a no-op, given that Apple is a US
> > corporation.
>
> Consider this scenario: I print out a piece of "export restricted" APSL
> source code, fly to Germany with it, and give it to Marcus. According to
> the US courts, I have done nothing illegal. Yet, if I remember the export
> clause correctly, I have violated my license.
No -- export to *US-embargoed* countries is the issue. So Marcus is
OK with Apple unless he's in (e.g.) Havana or Baghdad.
> I wrote:
> > I also find it a bit worrisome that you could misjudge such an
> > obviously non-free license.
>
> Chip Salzenberg writes:
> > Besides, hindsight is 20/20 -- if the export clause is so 'obviously' an
> > OSD violation, why is it only now a subject of public debate?
>
> I wasn't referring to the export clause.
But the export clause is the only OSD violation in the license, AFAIK.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"When do you work?" "Whenever I'm not busy."
