Chip Salzenberg writes: > We assumed that the export clause was a no-op, given that Apple is a US > corporation.
Consider this scenario: I print out a piece of "export restricted" APSL source code, fly to Germany with it, and give it to Marcus. According to the US courts, I have done nothing illegal. Yet, if I remember the export clause correctly, I have violated my license. I wrote: > I also find it a bit worrisome that you could misjudge such an > obviously non-free license. Chip Salzenberg writes: > Besides, hindsight is 20/20 -- if the export clause is so 'obviously' an > OSD violation, why is it only now a subject of public debate? I wasn't referring to the export clause. > We're hackers, not lawyers. (But we are looking to get a lawyer involved > from now on.) Excellent. -- John Hasler This posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
