I wrote: > I don't see that. The function names are, but those are pretty much the > same as page numbers. You can't copyright words.
Marcus Brinkmann writes: > gcc does include the header files in the compilation process. No. Gcc *reads* the header files in the compilation process. > They are processed and translated and mangled in many different ways, but > they are still included in some way. See Henning's excellent response. > A good test is to remove the header files and try to compile again, it > won't work. Remove gcc and try to compile again. It won't work. Does that mean the binary is a derivative of gcc? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI A good test is to remove the header files and try to compile again, it won't work.
