Avus wrote: > Unfortunately Debian didn't mention the system library clause and why > *they* didn't want to use it (DFSG don't allow non-free libs to be part > of the system).
In order for QT to qualify as a Debian system library it would have to be a 'required' package, and it would drag in X. No way are we going to bloat the system like that. The 'system library' idea thus fails for purely technical reasons. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
