On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > > There's a third exception. The implicit exception "if you're not > > doing something which requires permission from us in the first > > place, then we can't prevent you from doing it". I think people are > > arguing that it falls under the third exception, not the other two. > A copy of a creative work (Kaffe) is being distributed. That this > doesn't require permission from the copyright holder is unlikely.
But the *difference* between distributing Kaffe alone and distributing it with something else involves nothing that requires permission from the copyright owner. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
