debian-legal  

Messages by Date

• 2019/03/21 Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
• 2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar
• 2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Julian Andres Klode
• 2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/21 Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Florian Weimer
• 2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar Burchardt
• 2019/03/21 GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
• 2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Steve Langasek
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giovanni Mascellani
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Andrew
• 2019/03/20 Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Christoph Berg
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Andrej Shadura
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
• 2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/19 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Florian Weimer
• 2019/03/19 no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Bradley M. Kuhn
• 2019/03/19 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Florian Weimer
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Florian Weimer
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
• 2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/18 Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Jon Stanley
• 2019/03/18 Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Richard Fontana
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL Paul Wise
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Vincent Bernat
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Thorsten Alteholz
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giovanni Mascellani
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL David Lamparter
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
• 2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/17 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
• 2019/03/17 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
• 2019/03/17 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
• 2019/03/17 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Lamparter
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Don Armstrong
• 2019/03/16 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Andrej Shadura
• 2019/03/16 FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
• 2019/03/01 Re: do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Joël Krähemann
• 2019/03/01 Re: do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Nicholas D Steeves
• 2019/03/01 do I need to mention tiny change in copyright file Joël Krähemann
• 2019/02/27 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
• 2019/02/27 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
• 2019/02/27 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
• 2019/02/27 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Marco d'Itri
• 2019/02/26 EUPL (v1.2) and OpenSSL Peter Wienemann
• 2019/02/23 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Nicholas D Steeves
• 2019/02/23 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Nicholas D Steeves
• 2019/02/20 Re: Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Christian Kastner
• 2019/02/20 Re: Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Christian Kastner
• 2019/02/20 Enjoy the health benefits of safe, scalar light healing for your entire family admin2
• 2019/02/20 Is an English license mandatory in Debian? (was: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2) Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/02/19 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Christian Kastner
• 2019/02/19 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/02/19 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Christian Kastner
• 2019/02/19 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Landry, Walter
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 أحمد المحمودي
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Ben Finney
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Landry, Walter
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Giacomo Tesio
• 2019/02/18 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Joerg Jaspert
• 2019/02/17 Re: Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 Ben Finney
• 2019/02/17 Please advise regarding DFSG compliance of WPL-2 أحمد المحمودي
• 2019/02/16 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Daniel Hakimi
• 2019/02/16 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Landry, Walter
• 2019/02/15 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Ben Finney
• 2019/02/15 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Daniel Hakimi
• 2019/02/15 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Paul Wise
• 2019/02/15 redistribution of the ARIN TAL Marco d'Itri
• 2019/02/13 Sugar CRM Contact List Samantha Hicks
• 2019/02/12 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ben Finney
• 2019/02/12 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Martin Steigerwald
• 2019/02/12 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Martin Steigerwald
• 2019/02/12 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Jens Axboe
• 2019/02/12 fio: hash.h is not DFSG compliant Domenico Andreoli
• 2019/02/11 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ben Finney
• 2019/02/11 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ben Finney
• 2019/02/11 Re: Bug#919356: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ben Finney
• 2019/02/11 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Jens Axboe
• 2019/02/11 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ulrich Mueller
• 2019/02/11 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Ulrich Mueller
• 2019/02/10 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Domenico Andreoli
• 2019/02/10 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Kristian Fiskerstrand
• 2019/02/02 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Giacomo
• 2019/02/02 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Ola Lundqvist
• 2019/02/02 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Francesco Poli
• 2019/02/01 Re: Bug#903092: [RSVP] php-elisp: permission to relicense contributions required from past contributors Nicholas D Steeves
• 2019/01/29 Re: Geeqie embedding ZoneDetect timezone data Francesco Poli
• 2019/01/29 Geeqie embedding ZoneDetect timezone data Andreas Ronnquist
• 2019/01/28 Re: Is the pixabay license a free license as per DFSG? foss.freedom
• 2019/01/28 Is the pixabay license a free license as per DFSG? foss.freedom
• 2019/01/23 Re: Licensing of include/linux/hash.h Domenico Andreoli
• 2019/01/22 Re: Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear Ben Finney
• 2019/01/22 Re: Fw: Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear Domenico Andreoli
• 2019/01/22 Reach Out To Your Possible Clients sarah . bartholomew
• 2019/01/21 Bug#919356: dwarves-dfsg: Copyright/licensing is unclear Domenico Andreoli
• 2019/01/16 CentOS User Contacts Donna Workman
• 2019/01/16 Attivazione bonus Ramona Tivoli
• 2019/01/03 RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Debian Linux 7.11.0 - License Chapman, Laura
• 2019/01/02 Re: Debian Linux 7.11.0 - License Jason Crain
• 2019/01/02 Debian Linux 7.11.0 - License Chapman, Laura
• 2018/12/28 Коммерческое предложение--Генеральному Директору Прокопий Устинов
• 2018/12/27 Re: Bug#915537: MongoDB SSPL v1 license and the DFSG Florian Weimer
• 2018/12/24 CeCILL-B and the desert island test Benjamin Barenblat
• 2018/12/19 Elliott Erwitt, Personae, uno dei fotografi più importanti e celebrati del Novecento. Sprea Editori
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Giacomo
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Ben Finney
• 2018/12/18 Re: [License-discuss] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Thorsten Glaser
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Giacomo
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Ian Jackson
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/18 Re: Hacking License Ian Jackson
• 2018/12/14 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/14 Re: Hacking License Giovanni Mascellani
• 2018/12/13 Patent discussion on debian-legal (Was: Hacking License) Eloi Notario
• 2018/12/13 Re: Hacking License Eloi
• 2018/12/12 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/12 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/12 Re: Hacking License Ian Jackson
• 2018/12/12 Re: Hacking License Simon McVittie
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Eloi
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Giacomo
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Eloi Notario
• 2018/12/11 Appuntamento con il nuovo ciclo di lectiones magistrales di AFIP International Sprea Editori
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/11 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Paul Wise
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Paul Jakma
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Ian Jackson
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Giacomo Tesio
• 2018/12/10 Re: Hacking License Ian Jackson
• 2018/12/08 Re: Hacking License Giacomo
• 2018/12/08 Re: Hacking License David Given
• 2018/12/07 Re: Compatibility of GPLv2 and Apache v2 (OpenSSL again) Paul Wise

• Earlier messages
• Later messages