debian-legal

Messages by Date

2019/08/06 Re: upstream changing from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ without copyright holders permission Francesco Poli
2019/08/06 Re: upstream changing from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ without copyright holders permission Florian Weimer
2019/08/05 Re: upstream changing from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ without copyright holders permission Roberto
2019/08/05 Re: upstream changing from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ without copyright holders permission Florian Weimer
2019/08/05 upstream changing from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+ without copyright holders permission Eriberto Mota
2019/07/31 Re: Tux licensing again MJ Ray
2019/07/30 Tux licensing again Eriberto Mota
2019/07/28 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Russ Allbery
2019/07/28 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Ian Jackson
2019/07/25 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Eloi
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Yao Wei
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Florian Weimer
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Jeff Licquia
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Simon McVittie
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Giacomo Catenazzi
2019/07/24 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Landry, Walter
2019/07/23 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Scott Kitterman
2019/07/23 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Yao Wei
2019/07/23 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Adam Borowski
2019/07/23 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Guillem Jover
2019/07/23 Re: anti-tarball clause and GPL Jonathan Carter
2019/07/23 anti-tarball clause and GPL Adam Borowski
2019/07/19 Re: Commercial Use and Source Code Nicholas D Steeves
2019/07/19 Re: Commercial Use and Source Code Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
2019/07/19 Re: Commercial Use and Source Code Aron Reman
2019/07/19 Re: Commercial Use and Source Code Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
2019/07/19 Commercial Use and Source Code Aron Reman
2019/07/13 Re: [License] Gsas-II Francesco Poli
2019/07/11 Re: [License] Gsas-II Francesco Poli
2019/07/11 Re: [License] Gsas-II Landry, Walter
2019/07/10 Re: [License] Gsas-II Ben Finney
2019/07/10 Re: [License] Gsas-II Francesco Poli
2019/07/10 [License] Gsas-II MARIE Alexandre
2019/07/05 Re: Re: PCYNLITX and Copyright Issue Bagas Sanjaya
2019/07/05 BSDish licenses without explicit modification permission Paul Wise
2019/07/05 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Paul Wise
2019/07/05 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Francesco Poli
2019/07/05 Re: PCYNLITX and Copyright Issue David Given
2019/07/05 PCYNLITX and Copyright Issue Bagas Sanjaya
2019/07/03 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Paul Wise
2019/07/03 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Francesco Poli
2019/07/02 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Mihai Moldovan
2019/07/02 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Simon McVittie
2019/07/02 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
2019/07/02 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
2019/06/29 Confirm if this email is correct debian-legal@lists.debian.org Abdelkader Alsamman
2019/06/29 Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
2019/06/28 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
2019/06/28 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
2019/06/27 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
2019/06/27 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
2019/06/27 Re: Content Rating System - DFSG-free? Daniel Hakimi
2019/06/27 Content Rating System - DFSG-free? Bagas Sanjaya
2019/06/21 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
2019/06/21 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Ian Jackson
2019/06/13 Re: Public domain and DSFGness Landry, Walter
2019/06/12 Re: Public domain and DSFGness David Given
2019/06/12 Re: Public domain and DSFGness Ben Finney
2019/06/12 Public domain and DSFGness David Given
2019/06/05 Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
2019/06/05 Re: Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
2019/06/05 To Debian-legal Juelz
2019/06/04 Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Vincent Bernat
2019/06/04 Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module Nat Tuck
2019/06/03 Reply to copyright concerns for libzdb in Seafile Jonathan Xu
2019/05/30 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
2019/05/30 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Ian Jackson
2019/05/30 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Ian Jackson
2019/05/28 Sistemas de encadernação à sua escolha SUPRIMAX
2019/05/27 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
2019/05/26 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Andres Salomon
2019/05/22 NoViDaDe para facilitar nas embalagens - Refiladora com dispensador SUPRIMAX
2019/05/22 EMI shielded mesh-foil windows Holland Shielding Systems BV
2019/05/15 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Moritz Schlarb
2019/05/14 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
2019/05/13 Re: Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Mihai Moldovan
2019/05/12 Copyright concerns regarding Seafile Jan-Henrik Haukeland
2019/05/04 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
2019/05/02 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ian Jackson
2019/04/28 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Paul Wise
2019/04/27 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
2019/04/24 Re: Report Copy of Debian Logo Francesco Poli
2019/04/23 Animation videos for your next promotion Paul Joseph
2019/04/22 Report Copy of Debian Logo Ryan Hemsley
2019/04/10 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
2019/04/10 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ben Finney
2019/04/10 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Moshe Piekarski
2019/04/10 Re: Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package Ben Finney
2019/04/10 Custom license conditions and grant for Wordplay package (was: license compatibility) Ben Finney
2019/04/08 Re: license compatibility debian . mailinglists
2019/04/08 Re: license compatibility Ben Finney
2019/04/08 license compatibility Moshe Piekarski
2019/04/07 Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Francesco Poli
2019/04/04 Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Giovanni Mascellani
2019/04/04 Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Paul Wise
2019/04/04 Re: Free Software Guidelines Question Giacomo Tesio
2019/04/03 Free Software Guidelines Question Wade Pinkston
2019/03/29 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
2019/03/29 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
2019/03/29 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
2019/03/29 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
2019/03/29 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
2019/03/26 Re: Inquiry regarding Artistic License Florian Weimer
2019/03/26 Inquiry regarding Artistic License npdflr
2019/03/24 Re: EUPL (v1.2) and OpenSSL Peter Wienemann
2019/03/24 Re: Is screenshots.debian.net at risk? Johannes Schauer
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
2019/03/21 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Lamparter
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Eloi
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Christian Kastner
2019/03/21 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Christian Kastner
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
2019/03/21 Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Tagliamonte
2019/03/21 Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Julian Andres Klode
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/21 Re: GPL and the "system library" exception Florian Weimer
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ansgar Burchardt
2019/03/21 GPL and the "system library" exception Ansgar Burchardt
2019/03/21 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Steve Langasek
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giovanni Mascellani
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Andrew
2019/03/20 Bug#924937: libpq5: OpenSSL license contamination of GPL reverse-dependencies Christoph Berg
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Andrej Shadura
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Paul Jakma
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Giacomo Tesio
2019/03/20 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) David Lamparter
2019/03/20 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/19 Re: no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 no need to keep non-copylefted files that way in a copylefted project. (was Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence) Bradley M. Kuhn
2019/03/19 Re: redistribution of the ARIN TAL Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Florian Weimer
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Ole Streicher
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Roberto
2019/03/19 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/18 Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Jon Stanley
2019/03/18 Re: [Fedora-legal-list] The license of OpenMotif (Open Group Public License) Richard Fontana
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL Paul Wise
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Vincent Bernat
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Thorsten Alteholz
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giacomo
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Giovanni Mascellani
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL David Lamparter
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence David Given
2019/03/18 Re: FRR package in Debian violates the GPL licence Paul Jakma