"Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Putting it differently: if that was allowed, then why do we need glibc > to be LGPLed, and not GPLed? After all the C language and its basic > libraries are also standarized to great extent.
I can see no real reason. > But having glibc purely GPL just doesn't sound good, does it? It sounds like it would make for a lot of arguing with FSF, nothing else. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]
