On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:20:15AM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> >> I would recommend the Gateway Solo 9300 series myself. The hardware
> >> is of good quality, with only the soft-modem unsupported.
> >
> > I have a 5300. Erm. Softmodem?
>
> Software modem. Winmodem. However you prefer to pronounce it.
Yeeew! Right. I made damn sure the sales understood that I wanted
a real modem. so i got a minipci xircom with thernet and modem
but...
> As far as I can tell, anyway. It requires specialised drivers under
> Win32, fails to expose itself as a serial port and has the right sort of
> PCI specs to be a software modem.
>
> Not that I will object if you can point me at how to enable it as a real
> modem under Linux. :)
I can't get it to go under linux. :/ lspci gives mention of a uart in
there but setserial don't give me any results. :/
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
'We do more then just sing and dance. We've got a brain too.'
-- The Backstreet Boys
