On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 01:17:10AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:03:16 +0200, Francesco P Lovergine > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > I think the only serious reason to use svn is its similarity with > > cvs by the human interface point of view. So, using it is > > straightforward. Arch is quite involuted and underdocumented > > AFAIK. But, as always I could be wrong. > > Having actually started to use arch, I can't say I find it > under documented. There is a nice tutorial to get one started, and > then most command have an actually useful built in help.
Until you realise that you have to modify some obscure hidden file to get it working properly. Friendly, Sven Luther
