On Sat, 19 Jun 2004 09:27:05 +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 01:17:10AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:03:16 +0200, Francesco P Lovergine
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>> > I think the only serious reason to use svn is its similarity with
>> > cvs by the human interface point of view. So, using it is
>> > straightforward. Arch is quite involuted and underdocumented
>> > AFAIK. But, as always I could be wrong.
>>
>> Having actually started to use arch, I can't say I find it under
>> documented. There is a nice tutorial to get one started, and then
>> most command have an actually useful built in help.
> Until you realise that you have to modify some obscure hidden file
> to get it working properly.
What hidden file?
manoj
--
You will be aided greatly by a person whom you thought to be
unimportant.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
