On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:03:16 +0200, Francesco P Lovergine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I think the only serious reason to use svn is its similarity with
> cvs by the human interface point of view. So, using it is
> straightforward. Arch is quite involuted and underdocumented
> AFAIK. But, as always I could be wrong.
Having actually started to use arch, I can't say I find it
under documented. There is a nice tutorial to get one started, and
then most command have an actually useful built in help.
manoj
--
If the vendors started doing everything right, we would be out of a
job. Let's hear it for OSI and X! With those babies in the wings, we
can count on being employed until we drop, or get smart and switch to
gardening, paper folding, or something. Philip Wood
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
