* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 18:10]: > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 16:10]: > > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > > > > Given that everyone extremly dislikes the single source package scheme > > > > > > Well, if you're taking a poll, count me in favor of single source > > > > package. > > > > > Single source packages are nice, but not practical in the debian case. I > > > guess you will have uploads multiplied by 12 or so compared to today, if > > > you want to keep the reactivity that is possible today. > > > > Well, even if it is not possible to do a single source package, we > > should IMHO really be able to reduce the number of source packages in > > sarge to 0-1 for 2.2, 2 for 2.4 and 2 for 2.6. Of course, this means > > major work after we decided which kernel version should be released > > with, but I really think it's worth, because it makes it much easier > > for the security team.
> Yes, i agree with you, but this is fully orthogonal to what is currently > discussed here, at least this is how i understand this. Then I either didn't understand the discussion, or wrote my proposal in a wrong way. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
