On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:26:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 16:10]: > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:42:46AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote: > > > > Given that everyone extremly dislikes the single source package scheme > > > > Well, if you're taking a poll, count me in favor of single source > > > package. > > > Single source packages are nice, but not practical in the debian case. I > > guess you will have uploads multiplied by 12 or so compared to today, if > > you want to keep the reactivity that is possible today. > > Well, even if it is not possible to do a single source package, we > should IMHO really be able to reduce the number of source packages in > sarge to 0-1 for 2.2, 2 for 2.4 and 2 for 2.6. Of course, this means > major work after we decided which kernel version should be released > with, but I really think it's worth, because it makes it much easier > for the security team.
Yes, i agree with you, but this is fully orthogonal to what is currently discussed here, at least this is how i understand this. Friendly, Sven Luther
