On 09/25/2011 08:54 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > >>>>> openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with the >>>>> appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless. > > I do not think that this is a good solution. IMHO openjdk-6 should > build a package with the generic symlink.
sure, just check it in. > As an alternative: would it > be possible to provide an almost generic symlink? Something like > java-6-openjdk-32 or java-6-openjdk-64 depending on architecture? no. doesn't make sense for armel/armhf, and creating almost generic symlinks for almost all use cases is worse. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7f8edf.3000...@ubuntu.com
