On 09/21/2011 10:54 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le mercredi 21 septembre 2011 à 21:20 +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan a > écrit : >> Hi, >> >> Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 03:06:47, Matthias Klose a écrit : >>> On 09/01/2011 10:46 PM, Torsten Werner wrote: >>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Matthias Klose<d...@debian.org> wrote: >>>>> why deleting the remainder of the email and not reading the email up to >>>>> the end? >>>> >>>> JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk is the answer? I believe >>>> that we will see some FTBFS problems. But maybe that it might a good >>>> reason the switch to default-java. >>> >>> openjdk-6-jre-headless now doesn't use java-6-openjdk anymore. so with the >>> appropriate conflicts, this symlink can be moved to default-jre-headless.
^^^ >> Now, in unstable, we didn't have /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/ symlink or >> directory anymore. What's current plan ? Reintroduce this symlink with >> default-jdk package ? > Currently, what I am doing now is to add "default-jre-headless" as > dependency and using /usr/lib/jvm/default-java as path. > I know this will probably fail on some archs but I found it easy and not > that dirty. > > Anyway, I think we should come up with a better solution... (probably as > a symlink as you suggest). yes, see above. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e7a50ab.7060...@ubuntu.com
