> > It is available here: > > For the compiled version: http://sylvestre.ledru.info/debian/fop/ > > or > > svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/fop > > I'm just wondering about some points: I seem to recall that the point > of getting an updated version was that older versions seemed to work > less well with newer batik. Then, shouldn't fop tighten dependencies on > batik 1.7 ? If then, we should upload to experimental, and it would > probably be worth to see if we can move it to main. In particular, does > it work fine with openjdk -- or with other free java implementations (I > doubt that, as batik does not work really well with non-Sun stuff)? > > Could you check all that, please ? fop v0.95 needs Batik 1.7. I agree that it should go to experimental first. It seems that it needs this version for WMF stuff (at least). I also changed gcj to openjdk6.
I tested to build a 2400 pages documentation (Scilab's docbook to PDF) using also MathML & Latex. It works for me with OpenJDK & this version of FOP. > In addition, the debian/copyright file needs updating: most of the > files are Apache 2.0 (and not 1.1), but some files are public domain. > You might also want to make it a little more clear how the .dfsg archive > was made... (debian/README.debian only says about 0.94.dfsg, not the > 0.95 version !). Where did you see files in public domain ? I udpated the README.Debian and took the opportunity to add a script to repack the archive. See revision 7120. > BTW, it probably would be worth trying to adapt fop.sh and > fop-ttfreader.sh to the java-wrappers stuff, in order to offer a more > consistent interface with batik and other programs too - but I can do > that, since I wrote java-wrappers, after all ;-)... You are welcome :) Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
