Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008 18:23:00 Vincent Fourmond, vous avez écrit : > Hello,
Hi, > I've done quite a good deal of work to get the newer upstream version > of batik working, and I've picked up quite a few patches from here and > there too (credits given in the changelog). This resulted in an upload > to main/experimental a few days ago, that still has to go through the > NEW queue (contrib to main...), along with an upload to the same place > for xmlgraphics-common. > > The upload is to experimental, because I'm not sure I won't break > reverse dependencies, and also because there are some functionalities > that I did find were not working properly: Many thanks for your work on packaging batik 1.7 and move to main. I'm one of your future-reverse-depends (see ITP #281346 about jasperreports :) > * I have no idea of how rdepends should work and how they interact > with batik so I could not check that. I've just rebuild your package via pkg-java svn and try to rebuild my jasperreports one. Here is some comments : - Maybe you should create a NEWS entry about JAR name change : batik.jar doesn't exist anymore, the symlink is now batik-all.jar - Same for xml-apis-ext which is now required on classpath (compile and runtime) Concerning FOP, which has high coupling with batik : - Build : it seems to build OK when changing Build-Depends and Ant classpath during build - Run : debian/fop.sh need to be ajusted to include xml-apis-ext.jar in DIRLIBS. Just generate a PDF from a source FO which include some SVG graphs. Please note that, I've not tested fop extensively, just with some old FO documents with simple SVG. As a side note, fop upstream recommend [1] using batik version which come with theirs tarballs : batik 1.6 with FOP 0.94 and batik 1.7 with FOP 0.95 Cheers, -- Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/faq.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
